
Introduction: Why Consultants and Project Owners Need Specialized Engineering Arbitration Support
Engineering and design functions sit at the heart of every construction and infrastructure project. Whether it involves roads, bridges, energy plants, water treatment systems, industrial facilities, or smart city developments, the success of any project depends heavily on:
- the precision of engineering design,
- the diligence of supervision and approvals,
- timely issuance of instructions,
- effective project coordination,
- compliance with safety and technical standards,
- accountability among parties.
Unsurprisingly, engineering-related disputes have become some of the most complex and highly contested disputes in the construction sector. These disputes often involve:
- alleged design errors,
- contradictory or incomplete drawings,
- failure in technical approvals,
- delays attributed to consultants or owners,
- unclear specifications,
- performance issues in systems and equipment,
- disagreements over certificates of completion,
- claims arising from engineering decisions.
To manage such disputes effectively, consultants and project owners need specialized engineering arbitration support—a service LEXARB provides with exceptional technical depth and legal precision.
- The Nature of Engineering Disputes Faced by Consultants and Project Owners
Engineering disputes differ from ordinary construction disputes because they:
- revolve around technical causation,
- require interdisciplinary understanding,
- involve questions of professional responsibility,
- depend on complex evidence such as design calculations, system tests, and engineering logic.
Here are the most common engineering dispute categories.
- Design-Related Disputes
These disputes often include:
- structural miscalculations,
- incomplete or unclear drawings,
- contradictions between architectural, structural, and MEP layouts,
- design alterations or rework due to technical errors,
- failure of systems during testing and commissioning.
When these occur, both consultants and owners are often targeted by contractors claiming damages or delays.
- Delay Disputes Linked to Engineering Decisions
Many delays originate from:
- late approvals from consultants,
- slow design revisions,
- inconsistencies in drawings,
- unclear specifications,
- delayed instructions from owners,
- risk-related regulatory changes.
These disputes require rigorous delay analysis to determine whether responsibility rests with the consultant, owner, contractor, or external factors.
- Quality, Compliance, and Technical Performance Issues
Such disputes include:
- rejected works,
- challenges to quality inspections,
- equipment failures,
- non-conformity with project specifications,
- non-compliance with local regulations or international codes.
Owners and consultants must defend their decisions with solid technical foundations.
- Disputes Over Contract Administration and Supervision
Contractors often claim that:
- consultants issued contradictory instructions,
- supervision was inadequate,
- approvals were delayed,
- contractual interpretations were incorrect.
LEXARB helps consultants defend their professional decisions with evidence and expert testimony.
- Financial and Quantum Claims Stemming from Engineering Issues
These may involve:
- extension-of-time claims,
- prolongation costs,
- disruption costs,
- loss of productivity,
- cost impacts of design changes.
Engineering arbitration involves both technical and financial interplay, requiring experts in both domains.
- How LEXARB Supports Consultants and Project Owners in Engineering Arbitration
LEXARB offers a comprehensive model of support that integrates engineering understanding with legal strategy.
- Technical–Legal Case Analysis
LEXARB begins by:
- reviewing drawings, designs, and technical reports,
- analyzing correspondence and contract clauses,
- identifying root causes of the dispute,
- assessing whether engineering practice met industry standards,
- determining whether the contractor’s claims have merit,
- building a clear narrative for arbitration.
This dual technical–legal analysis sets the foundation for a strong defense.
- Expert Management and Coordination
Engineering arbitration requires experts in:
- delay analysis,
- structural engineering,
- mechanical and electrical engineering,
- quality control and compliance,
- specialist systems (HVAC, fire, automation),
- quantum.
LEXARB:
- selects appropriate experts,
- guides their analysis,
- aligns expert assumptions with legal strategy,
- ensures their reports withstand rigorous cross-examination.
- Arbitration Representation Before Leading International Centres
LEXARB represents consultants and owners before:
- ICC,
- LCIA,
- DIAC,
- SCCA,
- CRCICA,
- UNCITRAL panels.
The firm excels at:
- simplifying technical issues for tribunals,
- demonstrating the engineering rationale behind decisions,
- linking technical conduct to contractual obligations,
- challenging unfounded contractor claims,
- presenting evidence concisely and persuasively.
- Defending Consultants Against Professional Liability Claims
Contractors frequently accuse consultants of:
- slow approvals,
- inaccurate designs,
- changes that increased costs,
- inadequate supervision.
LEXARB works to:
- reconstruct the project timeline,
- assess cause and effect,
- rely on industry standards,
- demonstrate correct professional conduct,
- shift liability to the correct party when appropriate.
- Protecting Project Owners from Unjustified Contractor Claims
When contractors submit inflated or unjustified claims, LEXARB:
- verifies the technical validity of the claim,
- evaluates whether delays or costs stem from contractor performance,
- reviews engineering decisions to determine causation,
- challenges weak expert reports,
- prepares a solid defense that minimizes owner exposure.
- Strategic Settlement and Negotiation Support
Not every dispute needs a final arbitral award.
LEXARB negotiates settlements when advantageous, using:
- BATNA/WATNA frameworks,
- multi-scenario financial modeling,
- structured Med-Arb approaches,
- early dispute resolution sessions.
This helps consultants and owners avoid prolonged disputes and unnecessary costs.
III. Case Studies Demonstrating LEXARB’s Engineering Arbitration Support
Case Study 1 – Water Treatment Facility Design Dispute (USD 300 Million)
Issue:
conflicting hydraulic design interpretations.
LEXARB demonstrated:
- contractor misapplied the design data,
- consultant had followed correct engineering logic.
Outcome:
consultant fully cleared of liability.
Case Study 2 – Road and Highway Project Supervision Conflict
Contractor alleged:
- consultant delays and inconsistent supervision.
LEXARB proved:
- supervision was consistent with contract requirements,
- contractor delays resulted from equipment issues.
Case Study 3 – Delay Dispute in a Government Infrastructure Project
LEXARB identified:
- regulatory modifications beyond owner control,
- delays not attributable to owner or consultant.
Result:
claim reduced dramatically; owner protected.
Case Study 4 – Mechanical System Failure in an Industrial Facility
LEXARB demonstrated:
- design was correct,
- equipment failure resulted from manufacturing defects.
Outcome:
contractor and supplier were held accountable.
- Why Consultants and Project Owners Trust LEXARB
✔ Deep engineering comprehension combined with legal expertise
✔ Strong ability to manage and coordinate technical experts
✔ Mastery of FIDIC, EPC, and large-scale project contracts
✔ Extensive regional experience in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, and Egypt
✔ Track record of defending consultants and owners successfully
✔ Strategic approaches to settlement and negotiation
✔ Ability to dismantle weak contractor claims
✔ Multilingual team serving international clients
LEXARB provides strategic protection – preventing technical disputes from becoming financial or reputational crises.
Conclusion: Engineering Arbitration Support Is Not Just Legal Work — It Is Strategic Protection for Projects and Professionals
Consultants and project owners face significant exposure during disputes.
With LEXARB, they benefit from:
- technically informed legal strategy,
- powerful expert-backed arguments,
- strong arbitration advocacy,
- and effective negotiation skills.
If you are a consultant or project owner dealing with an engineering dispute—or seeking proactive support—contact LEXARB for specialized engineering arbitration guidance and comprehensive project protection.

